SAT MORN SIDE PAIRS

May 17, 2014

NS Section Sect G Winners 6 PAIRS
Pr	MPs	A	B		Names	Score	Percent
G-6	1.49	1	1	.	(B)Terrance Hill, Corvallis,OR; Steve Larsen, la Pine,OR	30.50	61.00
G-1	1.48	2	2	.	(B)Michael Rickus, Newport,OR; Garry Lowe, Newport,OR	27.50	55.00
G-3	.	3	.	.	(B)Robert Peery, Corvallis,OR; Carol McGinnis, Boise,ID	26.50	53.00
G-4	.	4	.	.	(B)Suzy Ryder, Boise,ID; Thomas Ryder, Boise,ID	24.50	49.00
G-2	0.99	5	.	1	(C)Nancy Remple, Portland,OR; Larry Henderson, Milwaukie,OR	21.00	42.00
G-5	.	6	.	.	(C)Bruce Thornburgh, Boise,ID; Randy Naef, McMinnville,OR	20.00	40.00

Results for Section G No Boards played 25 Average Score  25.00 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

 RESULTS OF BOARD 1








Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
♠ 7 5 
♥ Q J T 6 5 
♦ 7 6 5 
♣ A T 2 
♠ Q 9 6 2 
♥ 7 3 
♦ K 8 
♣ K 9 8 6 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ A J T 
♥ 9 8 4 2 
♦ Q T 2 
♣ J 7 4 



♠ K 8 4 3 
♥ A K 
♦ A J 9 4 3 
♣ Q 5 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 2N; 
NS 1S; NS 3H; NS 4D; 
E 1C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

 3NT
N
.
-5
      
  250
 
  0.00 
  2.00 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs    4-Ryder - Ryder 

  2D
S
3
.
.
  110
      
  1.00 
  1.00 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs    5-Thornburgh - Naef 

 3NT
N
3
.
.



 RESULTS OF BOARD 2








Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠ J 8 5 
♥ T 9 3 
♦ J T 8 2 
♣ A K 8 
♠ A 6 4 2 
♥ Q 7 5 
♦ K 5 4 
♣ J 9 6 


N
W
E
S

♠ K 9 7 
♥ K J 2 
♦ A 6 
♣ Q T 7 5 3 



♠ Q T 3 
♥ A 8 6 4 
♦ Q 9 7 3 
♣ 4 2 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 1D; 
EW 2N; EW 2S; EW 1H; 
EW 3C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

 2NT
W
2
.
.
      
  120
 
  1.50 
  0.50 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs    4-Ryder - Ryder 

 1NT
E
4
.
.
      
  180
 
  0.00 
  2.00 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs    5-Thornburgh - Naef 

 1NT
E
2
.
.



 RESULTS OF BOARD 3








Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠ Q T 8 2 
♥ K Q J 2 
♦ T 7 6 2 
♣ 2 
♠ J 7 6 
♥ T 5 4 3 
♦ K J 
♣ A K 7 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ 5 
♥ 8 7 6 
♦ A Q 4 3 
♣ Q T 9 5 4 



♠ A K 9 4 3 
♥ A 9 
♦ 9 8 5 
♣ J 8 6 




DF Analysis: (3) NS 3S; 
NS 1H; EW 3C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

  3S
N
4
.
.
  170
      
  2.00 
  0.00 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs    4-Ryder - Ryder 

  5S
S
.
-1
      
   50
 
  0.50 
  1.50 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs    5-Thornburgh - Naef 

  4S
S
.
-1




 RESULTS OF BOARD 4








Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
♠ J T 8 
♥ T 7 5 3 
♦ K 8 7 3 
♣ Q J 
♠ 7 2 
♥ 6 4 2 
♦ A Q 4 
♣ K 9 5 3 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ A Q 9 3 
♥ A K J 9 
♦ T 9 6 
♣ T 6 



♠ K 6 5 4 
♥ Q 8 
♦ J 5 2 
♣ A 8 7 4 




DF Analysis: (6) EW 3N; 
EW 2S; EW 3H; E 3D; 
EW 3C; W 2D; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

 1NT
W
3
.
.
      
  150
 
  0.00 
  2.00 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs    4-Ryder - Ryder 

 4NT
W
.
-3
  300
      
  2.00 
  0.00 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs    5-Thornburgh - Naef 

 1NT
W
.
-1




 RESULTS OF BOARD 5








Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠ Q 3 
♥ A T 4 2 
♦ 8 6 3 2 
♣ J T 6 
♠ 8 6 4 
♥ 7 6 3 
♦ A K T 9 7 
♣ 9 7 


N
W
E
S

♠ K T 7 5 2 
♥ K 5 
♦ 4 
♣ Q 8 5 4 2 



♠ A J 9 
♥ Q J 9 8 
♦ Q J 5 
♣ A K 3 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 3N; 
NS 1S; NS 3H; NS 2D; 
NS 1C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

  4H
N
.
-1

  4Cx
W
.
-2
  300
      
  2.00 
  0.00 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs    5-Thornburgh - Naef 

  4H
N
.
-1




 RESULTS OF BOARD 6








Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠ T 
♥ Q J 8 6 3 
♦ A J 4 
♣ Q 9 3 2 
♠ K Q 9 8 4 2 
♥ A 2 
♦ 8 7 
♣ K J T 


N
W
E
S

♠ A 7 6 3 
♥ K T 5 
♦ K 9 2 
♣ 8 6 5 



♠ J 5 
♥ 9 7 4 
♦ Q T 6 5 3 
♣ A 7 4 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 1H; 
NS 1D; EW 3N; EW 4S; 
W 1C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

  4S
W
4
.
.

  4Hx
N
.
-3

  4S
W
4
.
.
      
  620
 
  0.50 
  1.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    2-Remple - Henderson 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 7








Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
♠ T 9 8 7 2 
♥ Q 4 3 2 
♦ 4 
♣ Q 9 2 
♠ K Q J 5 4 
♥ J 9 7 6 
♦ A Q 6 
♣ 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ 
♥ A 8 
♦ K T 9 8 7 2 
♣ A K 7 6 5 



♠ A 6 3 
♥ K T 5 
♦ J 5 3 
♣ J T 8 4 




DF Analysis: (6) E 5N; 
EW 2S; EW 2H; EW 6D; 
EW 4C; W 4N; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

 3NT
E
5
.
.

 3NT
W
6
.
.

  5D
E
6
.
.
      
  620
 
  2.00 
  0.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    2-Remple - Henderson 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 8








Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
♠ A J T 
♥ Q J 
♦ K 9 8 7 
♣ A 6 5 3 
♠ 4 3 
♥ K T 9 8 
♦ Q J 6 5 
♣ K J 9 


N
W
E
S

♠ K Q 7 6 
♥ A 7 6 5 2 
♦ 4 2 
♣ 8 4 



♠ 9 8 5 2 
♥ 4 3 
♦ A T 3 
♣ Q T 7 2 




DF Analysis: (5) EW 1N; 
EW 1S; EW 3H; EW 1D; 
EW 1C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

  2H
E
3
.
.

  2H
E
3
.
.

  2H
W
3
.
.
      
  140
 
  1.00 
  1.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    2-Remple - Henderson 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 9








Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 
♥ A 4 
♦ A K 9 5 4 3 2 
♣ A J 8 7 
♠ J T 5 4 2 
♥ J T 7 6 
♦ 
♣ K 6 5 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ A Q 9 8 6 
♥ Q 5 2 
♦ T 8 6 
♣ Q 3 



♠ K 7 3 
♥ K 9 8 3 
♦ Q J 7 
♣ T 9 4 




DF Analysis: (6) NS 5N; 
NS 1H; NS 6D; N 4C; 
S 3C; EW 3S; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

  5D
N
6
.
.
  420
      
  1.50 
  0.50 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs    4-Ryder - Ryder 

  5D
N
5
.
.

  5D
N
6
.
.
  420
      
  1.50 
  0.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    2-Remple - Henderson 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 10








Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
♠ K 9 8 6 5 3 
♥ K Q J 
♦ A T 2 
♣ 2 
♠ A 7 4 2 
♥ 5 4 
♦ 4 3 
♣ Q T 9 6 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ T 
♥ A T 9 2 
♦ K 9 6 5 
♣ J 8 7 4 



♠ Q J 
♥ 8 7 6 3 
♦ Q J 8 7 
♣ A K 5 




DF Analysis: (6) NS 2N; 
NS 4S; N 2H; NS 2D; 
S 1H; EW 2C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

  4S
N
.
-1
      
  100
 
  0.00 
  2.00 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs    4-Ryder - Ryder 

  4S
N
5
.
.

  4S
N
5
.
.
  650
      
  1.50 
  0.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    2-Remple - Henderson 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 11








Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
♠ K 9 8 2 
♥ 9 2 
♦ A J 5 
♣ Q J 3 2 
♠ Q 6 4 
♥ J 8 7 4 3 
♦ K 7 2 
♣ K 9 


N
W
E
S

♠ T 7 
♥ A T 
♦ 9 8 6 4 3 
♣ 8 7 6 5 



♠ A J 5 3 
♥ K Q 6 5 
♦ Q T 
♣ A T 4 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 5N; 
NS 5S; NS 3H; NS 3D; 
NS 4C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

 3NT
S
4
.
.
  430
      
  2.00 
  0.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs    2-Remple - Henderson 

  4S
S
4
.
.

  4S
S
4
.
.
  420
      
  0.50 
  1.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    3-Peery - McGinnis 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 12








Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
♠ 8 4 2 
♥ Q J 6 5 4 
♦ A 3 
♣ J 9 5 
♠ J T 6 
♥ K 7 3 2 
♦ K Q 5 2 
♣ A 8 


N
W
E
S

♠ A K 7 
♥ A T 
♦ T 8 6 
♣ K Q 7 6 4 



♠ Q 9 5 3 
♥ 9 8 
♦ J 9 7 4 
♣ T 3 2 




DF Analysis: (5) EW 5N; 
EW 4S; EW 4H; EW 5D; 
EW 5C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

 3NT
E
6
.
.
      
  490
 
  0.00 
  2.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs    2-Remple - Henderson 

  2C
E
5
.
.

 3NT
W
4
.
.
      
  430
 
  1.00 
  1.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    3-Peery - McGinnis 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 13








Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
♠ K Q 8 4 
♥ K 6 2 
♦ 7 5 2 
♣ Q 9 5 
♠ 9 6 
♥ Q 7 3 
♦ J 9 
♣ A K J T 7 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ A J T 7 5 
♥ 4 
♦ Q T 8 6 4 
♣ 8 4 



♠ 3 2 
♥ A J T 9 8 5 
♦ A K 3 
♣ 6 2 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 3N; 
NS 3H; EW 2S; EW 1D; 
EW 1C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

  3H
S
4
.
.
  170
      
  1.00 
  1.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs    2-Remple - Henderson 

  4Cx
W
.
-2
  500
      
  2.00 
  0.00 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs    5-Thornburgh - Naef 

  4H
S
.
-2
      
  200
 
  0.00 
  2.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    3-Peery - McGinnis 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 14








Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
♠ T 9 5 
♥ A 6 
♦ 8 5 4 3 
♣ Q 9 7 5 
♠ A 8 
♥ T 7 5 
♦ K 9 2 
♣ T 8 6 3 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ J 3 
♥ Q J 8 3 2 
♦ A Q J T 7 
♣ K 



♠ K Q 7 6 4 2 
♥ K 9 4 
♦ 6 
♣ A J 4 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 1N; 
NS 4S; NS 3C; EW 2H; 
EW 2D; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

  4S
S
6
.
.
  480
      
  2.00 
  0.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs    2-Remple - Henderson 

  4H
E
.
-3
  150
      
  0.00 
  2.00 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs    5-Thornburgh - Naef 

  4S
S
5
.
.
  450
      
  1.00 
  1.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    3-Peery - McGinnis 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 15








Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
♠ 4 
♥ A K T 
♦ A K J T 7 5 
♣ K 5 2 
♠ J 7 6 5 
♥ J 9 8 7 6 
♦ 9 
♣ A 4 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q T 9 3 
♥ 5 3 2 
♦ Q 8 4 2 
♣ 9 8 



♠ A K 8 2 
♥ Q 4 
♦ 6 3 
♣ Q J T 7 6 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 5N; 
NS 3S; NS 2H; NS 5D; 
NS 6C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

 3NT
S
5
.
.
  660
      
  1.00 
  1.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs    2-Remple - Henderson 

  6D
N
.
-1
      
  100
 
  0.00 
  2.00 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs    5-Thornburgh - Naef 

 6NT
N
6
.
.
 1440
      
  2.00 
  0.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    3-Peery - McGinnis 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 16








Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
♠ Q 3 2 
♥ K Q 3 
♦ 6 3 2 
♣ K 8 6 5 
♠ K J 9 8 4 
♥ 2 
♦ K Q J T 
♣ 9 4 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ 7 5 
♥ A J 8 7 6 5 
♦ 9 
♣ A Q T 2 



♠ A T 6 
♥ T 9 4 
♦ A 8 7 5 4 
♣ J 7 




DF Analysis: (5) EW 1N; 
EW 3S; EW 2H; EW 1D; 
EW 3C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

  3H
E
3
.
.
      
  140
 
  0.00 
  2.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs    3-Peery - McGinnis 

 3NT
W
.
-1
  100
      
  1.00 
  1.00 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs    2-Remple - Henderson 

 3NT
E
.
-2
  200
      
  2.00 
  0.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    4-Ryder - Ryder 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 17








Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
♠ K Q J 8 5 
♥ Q 6 2 
♦ K 3 
♣ K 3 2 
♠ T 4 2 
♥ A T 8 
♦ T 6 
♣ Q T 9 8 7 


N
W
E
S

♠ A 9 7 3 
♥ K 3 
♦ A 9 5 2 
♣ A J 5 



♠ 6 
♥ J 9 7 5 4 
♦ Q J 8 7 4 
♣ 6 4 




DF Analysis: (5) N 1H; 
EW 2N; EW 2S; EW 1D; 
EW 3C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

 1NT
E
2
.
.
      
  120
 
  1.50 
  0.50 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs    3-Peery - McGinnis 

 1NT
E
5
.
.
      
  210
 
  0.00 
  2.00 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs    2-Remple - Henderson 

 1NT
E
2
.
.
      
  120
 
  1.50 
  0.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    4-Ryder - Ryder 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 18








Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠ 9 4 
♥ T 4 
♦ K J 9 8 5 
♣ A J T 9 
♠ A K 8 7 6 
♥ K Q 8 3 2 
♦ Q 
♣ 8 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q J T 5 2 
♥ J 7 
♦ A 7 2 
♣ K Q 3 



♠ 3 
♥ A 9 6 5 
♦ T 6 4 3 
♣ 7 6 5 2 




DF Analysis: (4) NS 2D; 
EW 1N; EW 5S; EW 3H; 




SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

  6S
E
.
-1
   50
      
  2.00 
  0.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs    3-Peery - McGinnis 

  4S
E
5
.
.
      
  450
 
  0.50 
  1.50 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs    2-Remple - Henderson 

  4S
E
5
.
.
      
  450
 
  0.50 
  1.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    4-Ryder - Ryder 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 19








Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠ Q 9 8 4 
♥ J 9 8 2 
♦ A J 
♣ K Q 3 
♠ A 7 
♥ A K 7 3 
♦ Q 8 
♣ T 8 7 6 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ T 3 2 
♥ 6 5 
♦ K T 9 6 
♣ J 9 5 2 



♠ K J 6 5 
♥ Q T 4 
♦ 7 5 4 3 2 
♣ A 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 1N; 
NS 2S; NS 2H; NS 1D; 
EW 2C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

 2NT
N
2
.
.
  120
      
  2.00 
  0.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs    3-Peery - McGinnis 

  4S
S
.
-2
      
  100
 
  0.00 
  2.00 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs    2-Remple - Henderson 

  2D
S
.
-1
      
   50
 
  1.00 
  1.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    4-Ryder - Ryder 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 20








Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
♠ A J 7 
♥ Q 
♦ A K J T 
♣ Q 8 7 5 4 
♠ 9 5 
♥ K T 9 6 
♦ Q 7 6 5 2 
♣ A 6 


N
W
E
S

♠ K Q 8 6 
♥ A J 7 5 
♦ 9 8 4 3 
♣ K 



♠ T 4 3 2 
♥ 8 4 3 2 
♦ 
♣ J T 9 3 2 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 3C; 
EW 2N; E 3H; EW 2D; 
W 2H; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

  6Cx
N
.
-4
      
 1100
 
  0.00 
  2.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs    3-Peery - McGinnis 

  4C
N
.
-1
      
  100
 
  2.00 
  0.00 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs    2-Remple - Henderson 

  3H
W
3
.
.
      
  140
 
  1.00 
  1.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    4-Ryder - Ryder 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 21








Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠ 8 6 4 
♥ Q J 9 7 4 
♦ 6 5 
♣ T 8 3 
♠ Q T 3 
♥ A T 
♦ A T 9 4 
♣ Q 6 5 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ 9 7 
♥ K 8 6 5 3 
♦ Q 7 3 
♣ A 9 7 



♠ A K J 5 2 
♥ 2 
♦ K J 8 2 
♣ K J 4 




DF Analysis: (4) EW 1N; 
EW 1H; EW 2D; EW 2C; 




SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

  1S
S
1
.
.
   80
      
  1.50 
  0.50 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs    3-Peery - McGinnis 

  2C
W
.
-1

  1S
S
1
.
.
   80
      
  1.50 
  0.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    5-Thornburgh - Naef 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 22








Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠ K T 5 
♥ A Q T 9 7 5 3 
♦ T 7 
♣ J 
♠ A Q 8 6 2 
♥ 2 
♦ 8 
♣ A K Q T 6 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ 9 
♥ K J 
♦ A 9 5 4 2 
♣ 9 8 7 5 2 



♠ J 7 4 3 
♥ 8 6 4 
♦ K Q J 6 3 
♣ 3 




DF Analysis: (6) NS 1H; 
EW 3N; EW 3S; E 1D; 
EW 6C; W 2D; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

  6C
W
6
.
.
      
 1370
 
  0.00 
  2.00 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs    3-Peery - McGinnis 

  5H
N
.
-4

  5C
W
6
.
.
      
  620
 
  1.00 
  1.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    5-Thornburgh - Naef 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 23








Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
♠ K Q 8 5 
♥ Q 9 7 6 
♦ 7 5 4 
♣ 5 4 
♠ 7 2 
♥ J 5 4 
♦ Q J 6 3 
♣ 7 6 3 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ T 9 4 3 
♥ 8 
♦ A 8 
♣ A K Q J T 8 



♠ A J 6 
♥ A K T 3 2 
♦ K T 9 2 
♣ 9 




DF Analysis: (4) NS 4S; 
NS 4H; NS 2D; EW 3C; 




SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

  3H
S
5
.
.
  200
      
  1.00 
  1.00 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs    3-Peery - McGinnis 

  4C
E
.
-1

  4Hx
S
5
.
.
  990
      
  2.00 
  0.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    5-Thornburgh - Naef 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 24








Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
♠ A Q 3 
♥ Q 6 
♦ A K 7 4 3 
♣ K 8 3 
♠ K 9 
♥ 5 4 3 
♦ J 8 6 5 
♣ J 6 4 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ J 7 6 4 2 
♥ 9 8 7 
♦ Q 2 
♣ A Q 9 



♠ T 8 5 
♥ A K J T 2 
♦ T 9 
♣ T 7 5 




DF Analysis: (6) NS 4N; 
NS 3S; NS 4H; NS 3D; 
N 4C; S 2C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

 3NT
N
3
.
.
  400
      
  0.50 
  1.50 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs    3-Peery - McGinnis 

 3NT
N
3
.
.

 3NT
N
4
.
.
  430
      
  2.00 
  0.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    5-Thornburgh - Naef 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 25








Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠ T 7 
♥ J 9 5 
♦ K T 9 8 
♣ T 9 7 2 
♠ Q 6 2 
♥ A T 7 6 4 
♦ Q J 6 
♣ A 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ J 5 4 
♥ Q 8 2 
♦ A 7 4 2 
♣ K Q J 



♠ A K 9 8 3 
♥ K 3 
♦ 5 3 
♣ 8 6 5 3 




DF Analysis: (4) EW 2N; 
EW 1S; EW 3H; EW 2D; 




SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
by
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names

  4H
W
4
.
.
      
  620
 
  0.00 
  2.00 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs    3-Peery - McGinnis 

  4H
W
.
-1

  4H
W
.
-1
  100
      
  1.50 
  0.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs    5-Thornburgh - Naef 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 1








Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
♠ 7 5 
♥ Q J T 6 5 
♦ 7 6 5 
♣ A T 2 
♠ Q 9 6 2 
♥ 7 3 
♦ K 8 
♣ K 9 8 6 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ A J T 
♥ 9 8 4 2 
♦ Q T 2 
♣ J 7 4 



♠ K 8 4 3 
♥ A K 
♦ A J 9 4 3 
♣ Q 5 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 2N; 
NS 1S; NS 3H; NS 4D; 
E 1C; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 0 míA 
.
0
.
  400
  0.00 
 10.24 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   0- 
 3 NT  N
.
-5
.
  250
  0.00 
  2.00 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   4- 
 2 ♦ S
3
.
.
  110
.
  1.00 
  1.00 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   5- 
 0 ♦ 
.
0
  250
.
  2.00 
 10.24 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 0 ♦ 
.
0
.
  110
  1.00 
 10.24 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   0- 
 3 NT  N
3
.
.
  400
.
  2.00 
  0.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   1- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 2








Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠ J 8 5 
♥ T 9 3 
♦ J T 8 2 
♣ A K 8 
♠ A 6 4 2 
♥ Q 7 5 
♦ K 5 4 
♣ J 9 6 


N
W
E
S

♠ K 9 7 
♥ K J 2 
♦ A 6 
♣ Q T 7 5 3 



♠ Q T 3 
♥ A 8 6 4 
♦ Q 9 7 3 
♣ 4 2 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 1D; 
EW 2N; EW 2S; EW 1H; 
EW 3C; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 0 míA 
.
0
  120
.
  0.50 
 10.24 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   0- 
 2 NT  W
2
.
.
.
  120
  1.50 
  0.50 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   4- 
 1 NT  E
4
.
.
.
  180
  0.00 
  2.00 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   5- 
 0 NT  
.
0
  120
.
  0.50 
 10.24 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 0 NT  
.
0
  180
.
  2.00 
 10.24 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   0- 
 1 NT  E
2
.
.
.
  120
  1.50 
  0.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   1- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 3








Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠ Q T 8 2 
♥ K Q J 2 
♦ T 7 6 2 
♣ 2 
♠ J 7 6 
♥ T 5 4 3 
♦ K J 
♣ A K 7 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ 5 
♥ 8 7 6 
♦ A Q 4 3 
♣ Q T 9 5 4 



♠ A K 9 4 3 
♥ A 9 
♦ 9 8 5 
♣ J 8 6 




DF Analysis: (3) NS 3S; 
NS 1H; EW 3C; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 0 míA 
.
0
   50
.
  1.50 
 10.24 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   0- 
 3 ♠  N
4
.
.
  170
.
  2.00 
  0.00 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   4- 
 5 ♠  S
.
-1
.
   50
  0.50 
  1.50 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   5- 
 0 ♠  
.
0
.
  170
  0.00 
 10.24 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 0 ♠  
.
0
   50
.
  1.50 
 10.24 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   0- 
 4 ♠  S
.
-1
.
   50
  0.50 
  1.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   1- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 4








Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
♠ J T 8 
♥ T 7 5 3 
♦ K 8 7 3 
♣ Q J 
♠ 7 2 
♥ 6 4 2 
♦ A Q 4 
♣ K 9 5 3 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ A Q 9 3 
♥ A K J 9 
♦ T 9 6 
♣ T 6 



♠ K 6 5 4 
♥ Q 8 
♦ J 5 2 
♣ A 8 7 4 




DF Analysis: (6) EW 3N; 
EW 2S; EW 3H; E 3D; 
EW 3C; W 2D; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 0 míA 
.
0
.
  100
  1.00 
 10.24 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   0- 
 1 NT  W
3
.
.
.
  150
  0.00 
  2.00 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   4- 
 4 NT  W
.
-3
  300
.
  2.00 
  0.00 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   5- 
 0 NT  
.
0
  150
.
  2.00 
 10.24 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 0 NT  
.
0
.
  300
  0.00 
 10.24 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   0- 
 1 NT  W
.
-1
  100
.
  1.00 
  1.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   1- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 5








Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠ Q 3 
♥ A T 4 2 
♦ 8 6 3 2 
♣ J T 6 
♠ 8 6 4 
♥ 7 6 3 
♦ A K T 9 7 
♣ 9 7 


N
W
E
S

♠ K T 7 5 2 
♥ K 5 
♦ 4 
♣ Q 8 5 4 2 



♠ A J 9 
♥ Q J 9 8 
♦ Q J 5 
♣ A K 3 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 3N; 
NS 1S; NS 3H; NS 2D; 
NS 1C; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 0 míA 
.
0
  100
.
  1.50 
 10.24 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   0- 
 4 ♥ N
.
-1
.
  100
  0.50 
  1.50 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   4- 
 4 ♣x W
.
-2
  300
.
  2.00 
  0.00 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   5- 
 0 ♣ 
.
0
  100
.
  1.50 
 10.24 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 0 ♣x 
.
0
.
  300
  0.00 
 10.24 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   0- 
 4 ♥ N
.
-1
.
  100
  0.50 
  1.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   1- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 6








Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠ T 
♥ Q J 8 6 3 
♦ A J 4 
♣ Q 9 3 2 
♠ K Q 9 8 4 2 
♥ A 2 
♦ 8 7 
♣ K J T 


N
W
E
S

♠ A 7 6 3 
♥ K T 5 
♦ K 9 2 
♣ 8 6 5 



♠ J 5 
♥ 9 7 4 
♦ Q T 6 5 3 
♣ A 7 4 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 1H; 
NS 1D; EW 3N; EW 4S; 
W 1C; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 0 míA 
.
0
  500
.
  0.00 
 10.24 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   0- 
 0 míA 
.
0
  620
.
  1.50 
 10.24 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   0- 
 4 ♠  W
4
.
.
.
  620
  0.50 
  1.50 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   4- 
 0 ♠  
.
0
  620
.
  1.50 
 10.24 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 4 ♥x N
.
-3
.
  500
  2.00 
  0.00 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   1- 
 4 ♠  W
4
.
.
.
  620
  0.50 
  1.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   2- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 7








Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
♠ T 9 8 7 2 
♥ Q 4 3 2 
♦ 4 
♣ Q 9 2 
♠ K Q J 5 4 
♥ J 9 7 6 
♦ A Q 6 
♣ 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ 
♥ A 8 
♦ K T 9 8 7 2 
♣ A K 7 6 5 



♠ A 6 3 
♥ K T 5 
♦ J 5 3 
♣ J T 8 4 




DF Analysis: (6) E 5N; 
EW 2S; EW 2H; EW 6D; 
EW 4C; W 4N; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 0 míA 
.
0
  690
.
  2.00 
 10.24 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   0- 
 0 míA 
.
0
  620
.
  0.00 
 10.24 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   0- 
 3 NT  E
5
.
.
.
  660
  1.00 
  1.00 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   4- 
 0 NT  
.
0
  660
.
  1.00 
 10.24 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 3 NT  W
6
.
.
.
  690
  0.00 
  2.00 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   1- 
 5 ♦ E
6
.
.
.
  620
  2.00 
  0.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   2- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 8








Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
♠ A J T 
♥ Q J 
♦ K 9 8 7 
♣ A 6 5 3 
♠ 4 3 
♥ K T 9 8 
♦ Q J 6 5 
♣ K J 9 


N
W
E
S

♠ K Q 7 6 
♥ A 7 6 5 2 
♦ 4 2 
♣ 8 4 



♠ 9 8 5 2 
♥ 4 3 
♦ A T 3 
♣ Q T 7 2 




DF Analysis: (5) EW 1N; 
EW 1S; EW 3H; EW 1D; 
EW 1C; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 0 míA 
.
0
  140
.
  1.00 
 10.24 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   0- 
 0 míA 
.
0
  140
.
  1.00 
 10.24 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   0- 
 2 ♥ E
3
.
.
.
  140
  1.00 
  1.00 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   4- 
 0 ♥ 
.
0
  140
.
  1.00 
 10.24 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 2 ♥ E
3
.
.
.
  140
  1.00 
  1.00 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   1- 
 2 ♥ W
3
.
.
.
  140
  1.00 
  1.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   2- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 9








Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 
♥ A 4 
♦ A K 9 5 4 3 2 
♣ A J 8 7 
♠ J T 5 4 2 
♥ J T 7 6 
♦ 
♣ K 6 5 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ A Q 9 8 6 
♥ Q 5 2 
♦ T 8 6 
♣ Q 3 



♠ K 7 3 
♥ K 9 8 3 
♦ Q J 7 
♣ T 9 4 




DF Analysis: (6) NS 5N; 
NS 1H; NS 6D; N 4C; 
S 3C; EW 3S; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 0 míA 
.
0
.
  400
  2.00 
 10.24 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   0- 
 0 míA 
.
0
.
  420
  0.50 
 10.24 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   0- 
 5 ♦ N
6
.
.
  420
.
  1.50 
  0.50 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   4- 
 0 ♦ 
.
0
.
  420
  0.50 
 10.24 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 5 ♦ N
5
.
.
  400
.
  0.00 
  2.00 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   1- 
 5 ♦ N
6
.
.
  420
.
  1.50 
  0.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   2- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 10








Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
♠ K 9 8 6 5 3 
♥ K Q J 
♦ A T 2 
♣ 2 
♠ A 7 4 2 
♥ 5 4 
♦ 4 3 
♣ Q T 9 6 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ T 
♥ A T 9 2 
♦ K 9 6 5 
♣ J 8 7 4 



♠ Q J 
♥ 8 7 6 3 
♦ Q J 8 7 
♣ A K 5 




DF Analysis: (6) NS 2N; 
NS 4S; N 2H; NS 2D; 
S 1H; EW 2C; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 0 míA 
.
0
.
  650
  0.50 
 10.24 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   0- 
 0 míA 
.
0
.
  650
  0.50 
 10.24 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   0- 
 4 ♠  N
.
-1
.
  100
  0.00 
  2.00 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   4- 
 0 ♠  
.
0
  100
.
  2.00 
 10.24 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 4 ♠  N
5
.
.
  650
.
  1.50 
  0.50 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   1- 
 4 ♠  N
5
.
.
  650
.
  1.50 
  0.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   2- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 11








Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
♠ K 9 8 2 
♥ 9 2 
♦ A J 5 
♣ Q J 3 2 
♠ Q 6 4 
♥ J 8 7 4 3 
♦ K 7 2 
♣ K 9 


N
W
E
S

♠ T 7 
♥ A T 
♦ 9 8 6 4 3 
♣ 8 7 6 5 



♠ A J 5 3 
♥ K Q 6 5 
♦ Q T 
♣ A T 4 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 5N; 
NS 5S; NS 3H; NS 3D; 
NS 4C; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 3 NT  S
4
.
.
  430
.
  2.00 
  0.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   2- 
 0 NT  
.
0
.
  430
  0.00 
 10.24 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   0- 
 0 NT  
.
0
.
  420
  1.50 
 10.24 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   0- 
 4 ♠  S
4
.
.
  420
.
  0.50 
  1.50 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   5- 
 0 ♠  
.
0
.
  420
  1.50 
 10.24 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   0- 
 4 ♠  S
4
.
.
  420
.
  0.50 
  1.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   3- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 12








Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
♠ 8 4 2 
♥ Q J 6 5 4 
♦ A 3 
♣ J 9 5 
♠ J T 6 
♥ K 7 3 2 
♦ K Q 5 2 
♣ A 8 


N
W
E
S

♠ A K 7 
♥ A T 
♦ T 8 6 
♣ K Q 7 6 4 



♠ Q 9 5 3 
♥ 9 8 
♦ J 9 7 4 
♣ T 3 2 




DF Analysis: (5) EW 5N; 
EW 4S; EW 4H; EW 5D; 
EW 5C; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 3 NT  E
6
.
.
.
  490
  0.00 
  2.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   2- 
 0 NT  
.
0
  490
.
  2.00 
 10.24 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   0- 
 0 NT  
.
0
  430
.
  1.00 
 10.24 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   0- 
 2 ♣ E
5
.
.
.
  150
  2.00 
  0.00 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   5- 
 0 ♣ 
.
0
  150
.
  0.00 
 10.24 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   0- 
 3 NT  W
4
.
.
.
  430
  1.00 
  1.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   3- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 13








Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
♠ K Q 8 4 
♥ K 6 2 
♦ 7 5 2 
♣ Q 9 5 
♠ 9 6 
♥ Q 7 3 
♦ J 9 
♣ A K J T 7 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ A J T 7 5 
♥ 4 
♦ Q T 8 6 4 
♣ 8 4 



♠ 3 2 
♥ A J T 9 8 5 
♦ A K 3 
♣ 6 2 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 3N; 
NS 3H; EW 2S; EW 1D; 
EW 1C; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 3 ♥ S
4
.
.
  170
.
  1.00 
  1.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   2- 
 0 ♥ 
.
0
.
  170
  1.00 
 10.24 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   0- 
 0 ♥ 
.
0
  200
.
  2.00 
 10.24 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   0- 
 4 ♣x W
.
-2
  500
.
  2.00 
  0.00 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   5- 
 0 ♣ 
.
0
.
  500
  0.00 
 10.24 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   0- 
 4 ♥ S
.
-2
.
  200
  0.00 
  2.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   3- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 14








Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
♠ T 9 5 
♥ A 6 
♦ 8 5 4 3 
♣ Q 9 7 5 
♠ A 8 
♥ T 7 5 
♦ K 9 2 
♣ T 8 6 3 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ J 3 
♥ Q J 8 3 2 
♦ A Q J T 7 
♣ K 



♠ K Q 7 6 4 2 
♥ K 9 4 
♦ 6 
♣ A J 4 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 1N; 
NS 4S; NS 3C; EW 2H; 
EW 2D; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 4 ♠  S
6
.
.
  480
.
  2.00 
  0.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   2- 
 0 ♠  
.
0
.
  480
  0.00 
 10.24 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   0- 
 0 ♠  
.
0
.
  450
  1.00 
 10.24 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   0- 
 4 ♥ E
.
-3
  150
.
  0.00 
  2.00 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   5- 
 0 ♥ 
.
0
.
  150
  2.00 
 10.24 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   0- 
 4 ♠  S
5
.
.
  450
.
  1.00 
  1.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   3- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 15








Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
♠ 4 
♥ A K T 
♦ A K J T 7 5 
♣ K 5 2 
♠ J 7 6 5 
♥ J 9 8 7 6 
♦ 9 
♣ A 4 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q T 9 3 
♥ 5 3 2 
♦ Q 8 4 2 
♣ 9 8 



♠ A K 8 2 
♥ Q 4 
♦ 6 3 
♣ Q J T 7 6 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 5N; 
NS 3S; NS 2H; NS 5D; 
NS 6C; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 3 NT  S
5
.
.
  660
.
  1.00 
  1.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   2- 
 0 NT  
.
0
.
  660
  1.00 
 10.24 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   0- 
 0 NT  
.
0
.
 1440
  0.00 
 10.24 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   0- 
 6 ♦ N
.
-1
.
  100
  0.00 
  2.00 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   5- 
 0 ♦ 
.
0
  100
.
  2.00 
 10.24 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   0- 
 6 NT  N
6
.
.
 1440
.
  2.00 
  0.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   3- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 16








Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
♠ Q 3 2 
♥ K Q 3 
♦ 6 3 2 
♣ K 8 6 5 
♠ K J 9 8 4 
♥ 2 
♦ K Q J T 
♣ 9 4 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ 7 5 
♥ A J 8 7 6 5 
♦ 9 
♣ A Q T 2 



♠ A T 6 
♥ T 9 4 
♦ A 8 7 5 4 
♣ J 7 




DF Analysis: (5) EW 1N; 
EW 3S; EW 2H; EW 1D; 
EW 3C; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 3 ♥ E
3
.
.
.
  140
  0.00 
  2.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   3- 
 0 ♥ 
.
0
.
  100
  1.00 
 10.24 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   0- 
 0 ♥ 
.
0
  140
.
  2.00 
 10.24 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   0- 
 0 ♥ 
.
0
.
  200
  0.00 
 10.24 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 3 NT  W
.
-1
  100
.
  1.00 
  1.00 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   2- 
 3 NT  E
.
-2
  200
.
  2.00 
  0.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   4- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 17








Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
♠ K Q J 8 5 
♥ Q 6 2 
♦ K 3 
♣ K 3 2 
♠ T 4 2 
♥ A T 8 
♦ T 6 
♣ Q T 9 8 7 


N
W
E
S

♠ A 9 7 3 
♥ K 3 
♦ A 9 5 2 
♣ A J 5 



♠ 6 
♥ J 9 7 5 4 
♦ Q J 8 7 4 
♣ 6 4 




DF Analysis: (5) N 1H; 
EW 2N; EW 2S; EW 1D; 
EW 3C; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 1 NT  E
2
.
.
.
  120
  1.50 
  0.50 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   3- 
 0 NT  
.
0
  210
.
  2.00 
 10.24 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   0- 
 0 NT  
.
0
  120
.
  0.50 
 10.24 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   0- 
 0 NT  
.
0
  120
.
  0.50 
 10.24 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 1 NT  E
5
.
.
.
  210
  0.00 
  2.00 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   2- 
 1 NT  E
2
.
.
.
  120
  1.50 
  0.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   4- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 18








Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠ 9 4 
♥ T 4 
♦ K J 9 8 5 
♣ A J T 9 
♠ A K 8 7 6 
♥ K Q 8 3 2 
♦ Q 
♣ 8 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q J T 5 2 
♥ J 7 
♦ A 7 2 
♣ K Q 3 



♠ 3 
♥ A 9 6 5 
♦ T 6 4 3 
♣ 7 6 5 2 




DF Analysis: (4) NS 2D; 
EW 1N; EW 5S; EW 3H; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 6 ♠  E
.
-1
   50
.
  2.00 
  0.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   3- 
 0 ♠  
.
0
  450
.
  1.50 
 10.24 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   0- 
 0 ♠  
.
0
.
   50
  0.00 
 10.24 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   0- 
 0 ♠  
.
0
  450
.
  1.50 
 10.24 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 4 ♠  E
5
.
.
.
  450
  0.50 
  1.50 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   2- 
 4 ♠  E
5
.
.
.
  450
  0.50 
  1.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   4- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 19








Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠ Q 9 8 4 
♥ J 9 8 2 
♦ A J 
♣ K Q 3 
♠ A 7 
♥ A K 7 3 
♦ Q 8 
♣ T 8 7 6 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ T 3 2 
♥ 6 5 
♦ K T 9 6 
♣ J 9 5 2 



♠ K J 6 5 
♥ Q T 4 
♦ 7 5 4 3 2 
♣ A 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 1N; 
NS 2S; NS 2H; NS 1D; 
EW 2C; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 2 NT  N
2
.
.
  120
.
  2.00 
  0.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   3- 
 0 NT  
.
0
  100
.
  2.00 
 10.24 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   0- 
 0 NT  
.
0
.
  120
  0.00 
 10.24 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   0- 
 0 NT  
.
0
   50
.
  1.00 
 10.24 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 4 ♠  S
.
-2
.
  100
  0.00 
  2.00 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   2- 
 2 ♦ S
.
-1
.
   50
  1.00 
  1.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   4- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 20








Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
♠ A J 7 
♥ Q 
♦ A K J T 
♣ Q 8 7 5 4 
♠ 9 5 
♥ K T 9 6 
♦ Q 7 6 5 2 
♣ A 6 


N
W
E
S

♠ K Q 8 6 
♥ A J 7 5 
♦ 9 8 4 3 
♣ K 



♠ T 4 3 2 
♥ 8 4 3 2 
♦ 
♣ J T 9 3 2 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 3C; 
EW 2N; E 3H; EW 2D; 
W 2H; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 6 ♣x N
.
-4
.
 1100
  0.00 
  2.00 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   3- 
 0 ♣ 
.
0
  100
.
  0.00 
 10.24 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   0- 
 0 ♣ 
.
0
 1100
.
  2.00 
 10.24 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   0- 
 0 ♣ 
.
0
  140
.
  1.00 
 10.24 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 4 ♣ N
.
-1
.
  100
  2.00 
  0.00 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   2- 
 3 ♥ W
3
.
.
.
  140
  1.00 
  1.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   4- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 21








Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠ 8 6 4 
♥ Q J 9 7 4 
♦ 6 5 
♣ T 8 3 
♠ Q T 3 
♥ A T 
♦ A T 9 4 
♣ Q 6 5 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ 9 7 
♥ K 8 6 5 3 
♦ Q 7 3 
♣ A 9 7 



♠ A K J 5 2 
♥ 2 
♦ K J 8 2 
♣ K J 4 




DF Analysis: (4) EW 1N; 
EW 1H; EW 2D; EW 2C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 0 míA 
.
0
.
   50
  2.00 
 10.24 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   0- 
 1 ♠  S
1
.
.
   80
.
  1.50 
  0.50 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   3- 
 0 ♠  
.
0
.
   80
  0.50 
 10.24 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   0- 
 2 ♣ W
.
-1
   50
.
  0.00 
  2.00 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   1- 
 0 ♣ 
.
0
.
   80
  0.50 
 10.24 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   0- 
 1 ♠  S
1
.
.
   80
.
  1.50 
  0.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   5- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 22








Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠ K T 5 
♥ A Q T 9 7 5 3 
♦ T 7 
♣ J 
♠ A Q 8 6 2 
♥ 2 
♦ 8 
♣ A K Q T 6 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ 9 
♥ K J 
♦ A 9 5 4 2 
♣ 9 8 7 5 2 



♠ J 7 4 3 
♥ 8 6 4 
♦ K Q J 6 3 
♣ 3 




DF Analysis: (6) NS 1H; 
EW 3N; EW 3S; E 1D; 
EW 6C; W 2D; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 0 míA 
.
0
  200
.
  0.00 
 10.24 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   0- 
 6 ♣ W
6
.
.
.
 1370
  0.00 
  2.00 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   3- 
 0 ♣ 
.
0
 1370
.
  2.00 
 10.24 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   0- 
 5 ♥ N
.
-4
.
  200
  2.00 
  0.00 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   1- 
 0 ♥ 
.
0
  620
.
  1.00 
 10.24 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   0- 
 5 ♣ W
6
.
.
.
  620
  1.00 
  1.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   5- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 23








Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
♠ K Q 8 5 
♥ Q 9 7 6 
♦ 7 5 4 
♣ 5 4 
♠ 7 2 
♥ J 5 4 
♦ Q J 6 3 
♣ 7 6 3 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ T 9 4 3 
♥ 8 
♦ A 8 
♣ A K Q J T 8 



♠ A J 6 
♥ A K T 3 2 
♦ K T 9 2 
♣ 9 




DF Analysis: (4) NS 4S; 
NS 4H; NS 2D; EW 3C; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 0 míA 
.
0
.
  100
  2.00 
 10.24 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   0- 
 3 ♥ S
5
.
.
  200
.
  1.00 
  1.00 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   3- 
 0 ♥ 
.
0
.
  200
  1.00 
 10.24 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   0- 
 4 ♣ E
.
-1
  100
.
  0.00 
  2.00 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   1- 
 0 ♣ 
.
0
.
  990
  0.00 
 10.24 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   0- 
 4 ♥x S
5
.
.
  990
.
  2.00 
  0.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   5- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 24








Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
♠ A Q 3 
♥ Q 6 
♦ A K 7 4 3 
♣ K 8 3 
♠ K 9 
♥ 5 4 3 
♦ J 8 6 5 
♣ J 6 4 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ J 7 6 4 2 
♥ 9 8 7 
♦ Q 2 
♣ A Q 9 



♠ T 8 5 
♥ A K J T 2 
♦ T 9 
♣ T 7 5 




DF Analysis: (6) NS 4N; 
NS 3S; NS 4H; NS 3D; 
N 4C; S 2C; 


SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 0 míA 
.
0
.
  400
  1.50 
 10.24 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   0- 
 3 NT  N
3
.
.
  400
.
  0.50 
  1.50 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   3- 
 0 NT  
.
0
.
  400
  1.50 
 10.24 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   0- 
 3 NT  N
3
.
.
  400
.
  0.50 
  1.50 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   1- 
 0 NT  
.
0
.
  430
  0.00 
 10.24 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   0- 
 3 NT  N
4
.
.
  430
.
  2.00 
  0.00 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   5- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 25








Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠ T 7 
♥ J 9 5 
♦ K T 9 8 
♣ T 9 7 2 
♠ Q 6 2 
♥ A T 7 6 4 
♦ Q J 6 
♣ A 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ J 5 4 
♥ Q 8 2 
♦ A 7 4 2 
♣ K Q J 



♠ A K 9 8 3 
♥ K 3 
♦ 5 3 
♣ 8 6 5 3 




DF Analysis: (4) EW 2N; 
EW 1S; EW 3H; EW 2D; 



SCORES
      
MATCHPOINTS

BID
made
down
N-S
  
E-W
    
N-S
    
E-W
   Names
 0 míAx 
.
0
.
  100
  0.50 
 10.24 
  1-Rickus - Lowe  vs   0- 
 4 ♥ W
4
.
.
.
  620
  0.00 
  2.00 
  2-Remple - Henderson  vs   3- 
 0 ♥x 
.
0
  620
.
  2.00 
 10.24 
  3-Peery - McGinnis  vs   0- 
 4 ♥ W
.
-1
  100
.
  1.50 
  0.50 
  4-Ryder - Ryder  vs   1- 
 0 ♥ 
.
0
.
  100
  0.50 
 10.24 
  5-Thornburgh - Naef  vs   0- 
 4 ♥ W
.
-1
  100
.
  1.50 
  0.50 
  6-Hill - Larsen  vs   5-