THURSDAY MORN SIDE PAIRS

May 15, 2014

NS Section Sect F Winners
6 PAIRS

Pr MPs A B Names Score Percent

F-2 1.49 1 . . (A)Bud Marsh, Scottsdale,AZ; Marianne Spanier, Scottsdale,AZ 33.50 67.00

F-5 1.97 2 1 . (B)Diane Caccamise, Coos Bay,OR; Bill Rosencrantz, North Bend,OR 27.00 54.00

F-1 1.30 3 2/3 . (B)Suzy Ryder, Boise,ID; Thomas Ryder, Boise,ID 24.50 49.00

F-3 1.30 4 2/3 1 (C)Chip Dombrowski, North Bend,OR; Ian Milligan, Corvallis,OR 24.50 49.00

F-4 . 5 . . (C)Marjorie Gilmore, Richland,WA; Marilyn Toher, Kennewick,WA 21.00 42.00

F-6 . 6 . . (B)Gary Nitzberg, Carson City,NV; Verna Bellus, Bend,OR 19.50 39.00
Results for Section F No Boards played 25 Average Score  25.00 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

 RESULTS OF BOARD 1








Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
♠ T 8 6 3 
♥ Q 7 5 2 
♦ K T 5 4 
♣ K 
♠ K 2 
♥ 9 6 4 3 
♦ A Q 
♣ A T 9 8 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q 9 7 5 4 
♥ A K J 8 
♦ J 8 6 3 
♣ 



♠ A J 
♥ T 
♦ 9 7 2 
♣ Q J 7 6 5 3 2 




DF Analysis: (5) EW 3N; 
EW 4S; EW 4H; EW 3D; 
EW 1C; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  4H E 4 . .         420    1.00   1.00   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs    4-Gilmore - Toher 

  4H E 5 . .         450    0.00   2.00   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs    5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz 

 3NT W 3 . .



 RESULTS OF BOARD 2








Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠ 9 2 
♥ K Q 8 
♦ A 6 2 
♣ A Q 9 8 5 
♠ 4 
♥ A 9 4 3 2 
♦ K J T 5 
♣ T 3 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q 7 6 5 3 
♥ 6 5 
♦ 9 8 4 
♣ K J 7 



♠ A K J T 8 
♥ J T 7 
♦ Q 7 3 
♣ 6 4 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 2N; 
NS 2S; NS 1D; NS 2C; 
S 1H; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

 3NT N 4 . .   630         2.00   0.00   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs    4-Gilmore - Toher 

 3NT N . -2         200    0.50   1.50   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs    5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz 

  4S N . -2 



 RESULTS OF BOARD 3








Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠ K 7 4 3 
♥ A T 5 4 
♦ 9 8 
♣ 8 7 2 
♠ J 6 
♥ 7 3 2 
♦ J 3 2 
♣ A Q J T 5 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q T 
♥ K Q 6 
♦ K T 7 6 4 
♣ 6 4 3 



♠ A 9 8 5 2 
♥ J 9 8 
♦ A Q 5 
♣ K 9 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 2N; 
NS 3S; NS 3H; EW 1D; 
EW 1C; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  2S S 2 . .   110         0.00   2.00   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs    4-Gilmore - Toher 

  3S S 3 . .   140         1.50   0.50   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs    5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz 

  2S S 3 . .



 RESULTS OF BOARD 4








Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
♠ A J 9 
♥ Q T 8 6 5 2 
♦ 8 4 
♣ A T 
♠ T 
♥ J 9 3 
♦ A K T 7 2 
♣ Q J 7 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ 8 7 5 3 2 
♥ 4 
♦ Q J 9 
♣ K 9 8 4 



♠ K Q 6 4 
♥ A K 7 
♦ 6 5 3 
♣ 6 5 2 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 2N; 
NS 2S; NS 5H; EW 2D; 
EW 3C; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  4H N 5 . .

  4H N 5 . .   650         1.50   0.50   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs    5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz 

  2H N 5 . .



 RESULTS OF BOARD 5








Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠ K Q J 9 2 
♥ T 
♦ Q 6 4 3 
♣ A K 5 
♠ T 4 3 
♥ K 7 6 5 3 
♦ A T 8 
♣ J 6 


N
W
E
S

♠ A 8 7 5 
♥ 8 4 2 
♦ K 5 
♣ Q 9 4 3 



♠ 6 
♥ A Q J 9 
♦ J 9 7 2 
♣ T 8 7 2 




DF Analysis: (6) NS 2N; 
N 3S; NS 1H; NS 3D; 
NS 2C; S 2S; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  2D N 4 . .

  6D N . -3         300    0.00   2.00   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs    5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz 

  2D N 3 . .



 RESULTS OF BOARD 6








Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠ T 2 
♥ 9 7 5 
♦ Q T 6 5 
♣ Q 9 7 4 
♠ 7 6 5 4 
♥ Q 8 3 2 
♦ A 2 
♣ 5 3 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ A K Q J 9 8 
♥ 
♦ J 9 8 7 3 
♣ T 6 



♠ 3 
♥ A K J T 6 4 
♦ K 4 
♣ A K J 8 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 4H; 
N 4C; S 3C; EW 1N; 
EW 4S; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  5H S . -1 

  4H S 4 . .

  4Sx E 4 . .         790    0.00   2.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    2-Marsh - Spanier 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 7








Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
♠ 9 7 2 
♥ A K Q 9 3 
♦ K T 9 4 3 
♣ 
♠ K J T 8 5 4 
♥ 7 6 
♦ J 7 2 
♣ K 9 


N
W
E
S

♠ 6 
♥ J 
♦ 8 5 
♣ A Q J 8 7 5 4 3 2 



♠ A Q 3 
♥ T 8 5 4 2 
♦ A Q 6 
♣ T 6 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 3S; 
NS 7H; N 5D; S 6D; 
EW 3C; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  5H S 7 . .   710         0.50   1.50   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs    4-Gilmore - Toher 

  6H S 7 . .

  5H S 7 . .   710         0.50   1.50   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    2-Marsh - Spanier 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 8








Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
♠ A Q 4 2 
♥ A 7 2 
♦ Q 9 7 4 2 
♣ K 
♠ J 9 6 
♥ 3 
♦ A K T 
♣ A J T 7 3 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ K 8 5 
♥ K T 6 5 4 
♦ J 6 5 
♣ Q 4 



♠ T 7 3 
♥ Q J 9 8 
♦ 8 3 
♣ 9 8 6 5 




DF Analysis: (6) EW 3N; 
EW 2S; E 1H; EW 1D; 
EW 5C; W 2H; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  2S S . -1          50    2.00   0.00   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs    4-Gilmore - Toher 

  2C W 4 . .

  2D N . -3         150    0.00   2.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    2-Marsh - Spanier 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 9








Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 7 3 2 
♥ 9 8 2 
♦ 6 3 
♣ T 9 6 3 2 
♠ A J 9 
♥ 7 5 3 
♦ Q T 8 7 4 
♣ A 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q T 5 
♥ A K Q J 6 
♦ A K J 2 
♣ J 



♠ K 8 6 4 
♥ T 4 
♦ 9 5 
♣ K Q 8 7 5 




DF Analysis: (5) EW 7N; 
EW 4S; EW 7H; EW 7D; 
EW 2C; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

 6NT W 6 . .        1440    1.00   1.00   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs    4-Gilmore - Toher 

  6D W 7 . .

  6H E 7 . .        1460    0.00   2.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    2-Marsh - Spanier 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 10








Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
♠ A 9 7 5 4 
♥ K 5 3 
♦ J 9 4 2 
♣ 2 
♠ K T 3 2 
♥ A J 8 7 
♦ Q 5 
♣ J 7 5 


N
W
E
S

♠ J 8 
♥ 9 2 
♦ K 7 6 3 
♣ A Q 9 6 4 



♠ Q 6 
♥ Q T 6 4 
♦ A T 8 
♣ K T 8 3 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 1S; 
NS 1H; NS 1D; EW 1N; 
EW 2C; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  3Cx W . -1   200         2.00   0.00   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs    4-Gilmore - Toher 

  3Hx S . -2 

P_O . . . .           0    1.00   1.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    2-Marsh - Spanier 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 11








Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
♠ J T 7 3 2 
♥ 4 
♦ A Q T 2 
♣ T 8 7 
♠ K Q 6 4 
♥ A 5 2 
♦ 7 6 
♣ K J 6 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ 8 5 
♥ 8 3 
♦ K 9 5 4 3 
♣ A Q 9 5 



♠ A 9 
♥ K Q J T 9 7 6 
♦ J 8 
♣ 4 2 




DF Analysis: (3) NS 2H; 
EW 2D; EW 4C; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  3H S . -1          50    1.00   1.00   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs    2-Marsh - Spanier 

  4C W . -1    50         2.00   0.00   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs    5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz 

  3Hx S . -1         100    0.00   2.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    3-Dombrowski - Milligan 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 12








Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
♠ A 6 3 
♥ Q J 9 3 2 
♦ K 7 2 
♣ 9 7 
♠ K J 9 7 
♥ K 8 
♦ 9 5 4 3 
♣ A K 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ T 8 5 
♥ A 7 6 4 
♦ A 
♣ Q T 6 5 2 



♠ Q 4 2 
♥ T 5 
♦ Q J T 8 6 
♣ J 8 4 




DF Analysis: (5) EW 2N; 
EW 5S; EW 3H; EW 1D; 
EW 6C; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

 1NT E 6 . .         240    0.00   2.00   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs    2-Marsh - Spanier 

 1NT E 3 . .         150    1.50   0.50   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs    5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz 

 1NT E 3 . .         150    1.50   0.50   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    3-Dombrowski - Milligan 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 13








Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
♠ Q T 8 6 3 2 
♥ A 4 3 
♦ 7 6 
♣ K 9 
♠ A J 9 
♥ 7 
♦ A K Q J 8 4 
♣ J 6 5 


N
W
E
S

♠ K 5 4 
♥ Q T 8 5 2 
♦ T 5 2 
♣ T 7 



♠ 7 
♥ K J 9 6 
♦ 9 3 
♣ A Q 8 4 3 2 




DF Analysis: (4) NS 2S; 
NS 2H; NS 4C; EW 3D; 




SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  3S N . -1         100    2.00   0.00   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs    2-Marsh - Spanier 

  3D W 4 . .         130    1.00   1.00   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs    5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz 

 3NT W 3 . .         600    0.00   2.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    3-Dombrowski - Milligan 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 14








Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
♠ 5 3 2 
♥ K Q T 8 
♦ 8 
♣ A K J T 9 
♠ A 9 
♥ J 9 5 2 
♦ K J 
♣ Q 7 6 3 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ K Q T 7 6 
♥ 4 3 
♦ Q 9 7 6 2 
♣ 8 



♠ J 8 4 
♥ A 7 6 
♦ A T 5 4 3 
♣ 5 4 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 2N; 
NS 3H; NS 3C; EW 1S; 
EW 1D; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

 1NT W . -3   150         2.00   0.00   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs    2-Marsh - Spanier 

  2H N . -1          50    0.00   2.00   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs    5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz 

  2S E . -1    50         1.00   1.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    3-Dombrowski - Milligan 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 15








Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
♠ K Q J 8 2 
♥ K 9 6 4 3 
♦ 
♣ A 9 2 
♠ A 
♥ T 2 
♦ K Q J T 9 8 5 4 
♣ K 6 


N
W
E
S

♠ T 9 7 4 
♥ Q 7 5 
♦ 7 3 
♣ J 8 5 4 



♠ 6 5 3 
♥ A J 8 
♦ A 6 2 
♣ Q T 7 3 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 1N; 
NS 5S; NS 5H; NS 5C; 
EW 2D; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  5Dx W . -2   300         0.50   1.50   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs    2-Marsh - Spanier 

  5S N 5 . .   650         2.00   0.00   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs    5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz 

  5Dx W . -2   300         0.50   1.50   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    3-Dombrowski - Milligan 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 16








Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
♠ A 
♥ J 
♦ K J 9 2 
♣ K Q J T 8 7 2 
♠ 8 6 2 
♥ K Q 2 
♦ Q 4 3 
♣ A 9 5 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q J 9 5 4 
♥ 7 6 5 3 
♦ A 6 
♣ 6 3 



♠ K T 7 3 
♥ A T 9 8 4 
♦ T 8 7 5 
♣ 




DF Analysis: (6) NS 3N; 
NS 2H; N 4D; NS 4C; 
S 1S; S 5D; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  3C N 5 . .   150         0.50   1.50   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs    3-Dombrowski - Milligan 

  3C N 5 . .   150         0.50   1.50   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs    2-Marsh - Spanier 

  5Cx N 5 . .   550         2.00   0.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    4-Gilmore - Toher 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 17








Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
♠ Q 7 3 2 
♥ 9 
♦ T 8 6 
♣ K T 7 3 2 
♠ J T 
♥ A K T 5 
♦ A K J 9 7 5 4 
♣ 


N
W
E
S

♠ A 9 8 6 
♥ 6 3 
♦ Q 3 2 
♣ A J 6 5 



♠ K 5 4 
♥ Q J 8 7 4 2 
♦ 
♣ Q 9 8 4 




DF Analysis: (6) NS 1C; 
EW 6N; EW 2S; E 2H; 
EW 6D; W 1H; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  6D W . -1    50         2.00   0.00   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs    3-Dombrowski - Milligan 

  6D W 7 . .         940    0.00   2.00   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs    2-Marsh - Spanier 

  3D W 4 . .         130    1.00   1.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    4-Gilmore - Toher 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 18








Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠ K 7 6 2 
♥ K Q 4 
♦ 8 2 
♣ J T 8 7 
♠ A 9 8 
♥ A 9 8 6 5 
♦ A Q 9 
♣ A K 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q J 3 
♥ T 
♦ K J 7 5 3 
♣ 6 5 4 2 



♠ T 5 4 
♥ J 7 3 2 
♦ T 6 4 
♣ Q 9 3 




DF Analysis: (8) EW 4N; 
E 3S; E 3H; EW 6D; 
E 3C; W 4S; W 4H; 
W 4C; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

 3NT W 6 . .         490    0.50   1.50   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs    3-Dombrowski - Milligan 

 3NT W 4 . .         430    2.00   0.00   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs    2-Marsh - Spanier 

 3NT E 6 . .         490    0.50   1.50   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    4-Gilmore - Toher 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 19








Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 6 2 
♥ A 8 6 5 
♦ Q 8 7 5 
♣ A Q 7 
♠ A K Q 8 3 
♥ 7 4 3 2 
♦ 9 3 
♣ J 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ J 7 
♥ Q 9 
♦ A K J 6 2 
♣ K T 6 4 



♠ T 9 5 4 
♥ K J T 
♦ T 4 
♣ 9 8 5 2 




DF Analysis: (5) EW 2N; 
EW 3S; EW 1H; EW 2D; 
EW 2C; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

 3NT E 4 . .         630    0.00   2.00   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs    3-Dombrowski - Milligan 

 1NT E 3 . .         150    1.00   1.00   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs    2-Marsh - Spanier 

  2S W 2 . .         110    2.00   0.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    4-Gilmore - Toher 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 20








Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
♠ 8 5 
♥ A T 
♦ K T 7 5 4 3 
♣ Q J 5 
♠ 7 4 2 
♥ K 8 5 4 2 
♦ Q 6 2 
♣ 7 6 


N
W
E
S

♠ K Q T 9 3 
♥ 7 6 
♦ J 8 
♣ A K 9 8 



♠ A J 6 
♥ Q J 9 3 
♦ A 9 
♣ T 4 3 2 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 3N; 
NS 1S; NS 1H; NS 3D; 
NS 3C; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  3S E . -3   300         2.00   0.00   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs    3-Dombrowski - Milligan 

  3S E . -1   100         0.00   2.00   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs    2-Marsh - Spanier 

  3D N 4 . .   130         1.00   1.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    4-Gilmore - Toher 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 21








Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠ A K T 9 
♥ 8 5 
♦ Q T 9 6 3 
♣ A 4 
♠ 7 
♥ A 4 2 
♦ A K 8 5 4 
♣ K 7 6 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q 6 5 4 3 2 
♥ K T 9 
♦ 7 
♣ Q 5 3 



♠ J 8 
♥ Q J 7 6 3 
♦ J 2 
♣ J T 9 8 




DF Analysis: (5) EW 1N; 
EW 2S; EW 1H; EW 1D; 
EW 2C; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  4S E . -3   150         2.00   0.00   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs    3-Dombrowski - Milligan 

 2NT W . -1 

 3NT N . -3         300    0.00   2.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 22








Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠ Q 9 3 
♥ K T 9 8 5 
♦ Q T 
♣ A 8 2 
♠ K J 7 5 4 2 
♥ 3 2 
♦ 9 5 2 
♣ T 6 


N
W
E
S

♠ A T 6 
♥ Q J 6 4 
♦ A K 
♣ K 5 4 3 



♠ 8 
♥ A 7 
♦ J 8 7 6 4 3 
♣ Q J 9 7 




DF Analysis: (5) N 1H; 
NS 2D; NS 1C; EW 1N; 
EW 4S; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  4S W . -2   200         2.00   0.00   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs    3-Dombrowski - Milligan 

  3S E 3 . .

  4S E . -1   100         1.00   1.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 23








Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
♠ T 4 3 
♥ 8 7 
♦ K Q T 8 7 2 
♣ J 3 
♠ J 9 8 
♥ Q 9 6 3 
♦ J 6 
♣ A K 8 5 


N
W
E
S

♠ A 5 
♥ A T 5 4 
♦ 5 3 
♣ Q 9 7 6 2 



♠ K Q 7 6 2 
♥ K J 2 
♦ A 9 4 
♣ T 4 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 3S; 
NS 3D; EW 1N; EW 3H; 
EW 3C; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  2S N 4 . .   170         1.50   0.50   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs    3-Dombrowski - Milligan 

  2S S 4 . .

  4S S . -2         200    0.00   2.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 24








Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
♠ J 8 2 
♥ J 9 6 3 2 
♦ 2 
♣ J T 7 3 
♠ K T 6 3 
♥ 8 
♦ A J 9 
♣ A K 9 8 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ A Q 4 
♥ Q T 7 
♦ K Q 7 
♣ Q 6 5 2 



♠ 9 7 5 
♥ A K 5 4 
♦ T 8 6 5 4 3 
♣ 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 1H; 
EW 4N; EW 5S; EW 2D; 
EW 5C; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

 3NT E 5 . .         460    0.00   2.00   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs    3-Dombrowski - Milligan 

 3NT E 4 . .

  6C W . -1    50         2.00   0.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 25








Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠ J 4 3 2 
♥ Q J 
♦ A J 
♣ A K 7 5 3 
♠ A 
♥ A K 9 8 7 6 5 4 
♦ 9 2 
♣ 6 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ 7 5 
♥ T 3 
♦ T 8 6 5 
♣ Q J T 9 2 



♠ K Q T 9 8 6 
♥ 2 
♦ K Q 7 4 3 
♣ 8 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 5S; 
NS 4D; NS 2C; EW 2N; 
EW 2H; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID by made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names

  5S N 6 . .   480         2.00   0.00   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs    3-Dombrowski - Milligan 

  4S N 5 . .

  4S N 5 . .   450         0.50   1.50   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs    5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 1








Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
♠ T 8 6 3 
♥ Q 7 5 2 
♦ K T 5 4 
♣ K 
♠ K 2 
♥ 9 6 4 3 
♦ A Q 
♣ A T 9 8 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q 9 7 5 4 
♥ A K J 8 
♦ J 8 6 3 
♣ 



♠ A J 
♥ T 
♦ 9 7 2 
♣ Q J 7 6 5 3 2 




DF Analysis: (5) EW 3N; 
EW 4S; EW 4H; EW 3D; 
EW 1C; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 0 m�A . 0   400 .   0.00  10.24   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 4 ♥ E 4 . . .   420   1.00   1.00   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   4- 
 4 ♥ E 5 . . .   450   0.00   2.00   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   5- 
 0 ♥ . 0   420 .   1.00  10.24   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   0- 
 0 ♥ . 0   450 .   2.00  10.24   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   0- 
 3 NT  W 3 . . .   400   2.00   0.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   1- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 2








Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠ 9 2 
♥ K Q 8 
♦ A 6 2 
♣ A Q 9 8 5 
♠ 4 
♥ A 9 4 3 2 
♦ K J T 5 
♣ T 3 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q 7 6 5 3 
♥ 6 5 
♦ 9 8 4 
♣ K J 7 



♠ A K J T 8 
♥ J T 7 
♦ Q 7 3 
♣ 6 4 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 2N; 
NS 2S; NS 1D; NS 2C; 
S 1H; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 0 m�A . 0   200 .   1.50  10.24   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 3 NT  N 4 . .   630 .   2.00   0.00   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   4- 
 3 NT  N . -2 .   200   0.50   1.50   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   5- 
 0 NT  . 0 .   630   0.00  10.24   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   0- 
 0 NT  . 0   200 .   1.50  10.24   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   0- 
 4 ♠  N . -2 .   200   0.50   1.50   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   1- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 3








Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠ K 7 4 3 
♥ A T 5 4 
♦ 9 8 
♣ 8 7 2 
♠ J 6 
♥ 7 3 2 
♦ J 3 2 
♣ A Q J T 5 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q T 
♥ K Q 6 
♦ K T 7 6 4 
♣ 6 4 3 



♠ A 9 8 5 2 
♥ J 9 8 
♦ A Q 5 
♣ K 9 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 2N; 
NS 3S; NS 3H; EW 1D; 
EW 1C; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 0 m�A . 0 .   140   0.50  10.24   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 2 ♠  S 2 . .   110 .   0.00   2.00   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   4- 
 3 ♠  S 3 . .   140 .   1.50   0.50   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   5- 
 0 ♠  . 0 .   110   2.00  10.24   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   0- 
 0 ♠  . 0 .   140   0.50  10.24   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   0- 
 2 ♠  S 3 . .   140 .   1.50   0.50   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   1- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 4








Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
♠ A J 9 
♥ Q T 8 6 5 2 
♦ 8 4 
♣ A T 
♠ T 
♥ J 9 3 
♦ A K T 7 2 
♣ Q J 7 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ 8 7 5 3 2 
♥ 4 
♦ Q J 9 
♣ K 9 8 4 



♠ K Q 6 4 
♥ A K 7 
♦ 6 5 3 
♣ 6 5 2 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 2N; 
NS 2S; NS 5H; EW 2D; 
EW 3C; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 0 m�A . 0 .   200   2.00  10.24   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 4 ♥ N 5 . .   650 .   1.50   0.50   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   4- 
 4 ♥ N 5 . .   650 .   1.50   0.50   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   5- 
 0 ♥ . 0 .   650   0.50  10.24   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   0- 
 0 ♥ . 0 .   650   0.50  10.24   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   0- 
 2 ♥ N 5 . .   200 .   0.00   2.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   1- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 5








Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠ K Q J 9 2 
♥ T 
♦ Q 6 4 3 
♣ A K 5 
♠ T 4 3 
♥ K 7 6 5 3 
♦ A T 8 
♣ J 6 


N
W
E
S

♠ A 8 7 5 
♥ 8 4 2 
♦ K 5 
♣ Q 9 4 3 



♠ 6 
♥ A Q J 9 
♦ J 9 7 2 
♣ T 8 7 2 




DF Analysis: (6) NS 2N; 
N 3S; NS 1H; NS 3D; 
NS 2C; S 2S; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 0 m�A . 0 .   110   1.00  10.24   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 2 ♦ N 4 . .   130 .   2.00   0.00   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   4- 
 6 ♦ N . -3 .   300   0.00   2.00   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   5- 
 0 ♦ . 0 .   130   0.00  10.24   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   0- 
 0 ♦ . 0   300 .   2.00  10.24   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   0- 
 2 ♦ N 3 . .   110 .   1.00   1.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   1- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 6








Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠ T 2 
♥ 9 7 5 
♦ Q T 6 5 
♣ Q 9 7 4 
♠ 7 6 5 4 
♥ Q 8 3 2 
♦ A 2 
♣ 5 3 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ A K Q J 9 8 
♥ 
♦ J 9 8 7 3 
♣ T 6 



♠ 3 
♥ A K J T 6 4 
♦ K 4 
♣ A K J 8 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 4H; 
N 4C; S 3C; EW 1N; 
EW 4S; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 0 m�A . 0 .   420   0.00  10.24   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 0 m�A . 0   790 .   2.00  10.24   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   0- 
 5 ♥ S . -1 .    50   1.00   1.00   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   4- 
 0 ♥ . 0    50 .   1.00  10.24   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   0- 
 4 ♥ S 4 . .   420 .   2.00   0.00   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   1- 
 4 ♠ x E 4 . . .   790   0.00   2.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   2- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 7








Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
♠ 9 7 2 
♥ A K Q 9 3 
♦ K T 9 4 3 
♣ 
♠ K J T 8 5 4 
♥ 7 6 
♦ J 7 2 
♣ K 9 


N
W
E
S

♠ 6 
♥ J 
♦ 8 5 
♣ A Q J 8 7 5 4 3 2 



♠ A Q 3 
♥ T 8 5 4 2 
♦ A Q 6 
♣ T 6 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 3S; 
NS 7H; N 5D; S 6D; 
EW 3C; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 0 m�A . 0 .  1460   0.00  10.24   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 0 m�A . 0 .   710   1.50  10.24   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   0- 
 5 ♥ S 7 . .   710 .   0.50   1.50   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   4- 
 0 ♥ . 0 .   710   1.50  10.24   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   0- 
 6 ♥ S 7 . .  1460 .   2.00   0.00   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   1- 
 5 ♥ S 7 . .   710 .   0.50   1.50   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   2- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 8








Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
♠ A Q 4 2 
♥ A 7 2 
♦ Q 9 7 4 2 
♣ K 
♠ J 9 6 
♥ 3 
♦ A K T 
♣ A J T 7 3 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ K 8 5 
♥ K T 6 5 4 
♦ J 6 5 
♣ Q 4 



♠ T 7 3 
♥ Q J 9 8 
♦ 8 3 
♣ 9 8 6 5 




DF Analysis: (6) EW 3N; 
EW 2S; E 1H; EW 1D; 
EW 5C; W 2H; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 0 m�A . 0   130 .   1.00  10.24   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 0 m�A . 0   150 .   2.00  10.24   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   0- 
 2 ♠  S . -1 .    50   2.00   0.00   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   4- 
 0 ♠  . 0    50 .   0.00  10.24   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   0- 
 2 ♣ W 4 . . .   130   1.00   1.00   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   1- 
 2 ♦ N . -3 .   150   0.00   2.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   2- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 9








Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 7 3 2 
♥ 9 8 2 
♦ 6 3 
♣ T 9 6 3 2 
♠ A J 9 
♥ 7 5 3 
♦ Q T 8 7 4 
♣ A 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q T 5 
♥ A K Q J 6 
♦ A K J 2 
♣ J 



♠ K 8 6 4 
♥ T 4 
♦ 9 5 
♣ K Q 8 7 5 




DF Analysis: (5) EW 7N; 
EW 4S; EW 7H; EW 7D; 
EW 2C; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 0 m�A . 0  1390 .   0.00  10.24   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 0 m�A . 0  1460 .   2.00  10.24   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   0- 
 6 NT  W 6 . . .  1440   1.00   1.00   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   4- 
 0 NT  . 0  1440 .   1.00  10.24   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   0- 
 6 ♦ W 7 . . .  1390   2.00   0.00   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   1- 
 6 ♥ E 7 . . .  1460   0.00   2.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   2- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 10








Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
♠ A 9 7 5 4 
♥ K 5 3 
♦ J 9 4 2 
♣ 2 
♠ K T 3 2 
♥ A J 8 7 
♦ Q 5 
♣ J 7 5 


N
W
E
S

♠ J 8 
♥ 9 2 
♦ K 7 6 3 
♣ A Q 9 6 4 



♠ Q 6 
♥ Q T 6 4 
♦ A T 8 
♣ K T 8 3 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 1S; 
NS 1H; NS 1D; EW 1N; 
EW 2C; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 0 m�A . 0   500 .   2.00  10.24   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
P_O . . . .     0   1.00  10.24   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   0- 
 3 ♣x W . -1   200 .   2.00   0.00   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   4- 
 0 ♣ . 0 .   200   0.00  10.24   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   0- 
 3 ♥x S . -2 .   500   0.00   2.00   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   1- 
P_O . . . .     0   1.00   1.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   2- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 11








Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
♠ J T 7 3 2 
♥ 4 
♦ A Q T 2 
♣ T 8 7 
♠ K Q 6 4 
♥ A 5 2 
♦ 7 6 
♣ K J 6 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ 8 5 
♥ 8 3 
♦ K 9 5 4 3 
♣ A Q 9 5 



♠ A 9 
♥ K Q J T 9 7 6 
♦ J 8 
♣ 4 2 




DF Analysis: (3) NS 2H; 
EW 2D; EW 4C; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 3 ♥ S . -1 .    50   1.00   1.00   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   2- 
 0 ♥ . 0    50 .   1.00  10.24   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   0- 
 0 ♥ . 0   100 .   2.00  10.24   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   0- 
 4 ♣ W . -1    50 .   2.00   0.00   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   5- 
 0 ♣ . 0 .    50   0.00  10.24   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   0- 
 3 ♥x S . -1 .   100   0.00   2.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   3- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 12








Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
♠ A 6 3 
♥ Q J 9 3 2 
♦ K 7 2 
♣ 9 7 
♠ K J 9 7 
♥ K 8 
♦ 9 5 4 3 
♣ A K 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ T 8 5 
♥ A 7 6 4 
♦ A 
♣ Q T 6 5 2 



♠ Q 4 2 
♥ T 5 
♦ Q J T 8 6 
♣ J 8 4 




DF Analysis: (5) EW 2N; 
EW 5S; EW 3H; EW 1D; 
EW 6C; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 1 NT  E 6 . . .   240   0.00   2.00   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   2- 
 0 NT  . 0   240 .   2.00  10.24   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   0- 
 0 NT  . 0   150 .   0.50  10.24   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   0- 
 1 NT  E 3 . . .   150   1.50   0.50   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   5- 
 0 NT  . 0   150 .   0.50  10.24   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   0- 
 1 NT  E 3 . . .   150   1.50   0.50   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   3- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 13








Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
♠ Q T 8 6 3 2 
♥ A 4 3 
♦ 7 6 
♣ K 9 
♠ A J 9 
♥ 7 
♦ A K Q J 8 4 
♣ J 6 5 


N
W
E
S

♠ K 5 4 
♥ Q T 8 5 2 
♦ T 5 2 
♣ T 7 



♠ 7 
♥ K J 9 6 
♦ 9 3 
♣ A Q 8 4 3 2 




DF Analysis: (4) NS 2S; 
NS 2H; NS 4C; EW 3D; 



SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 3 ♠  N . -1 .   100   2.00   0.00   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   2- 
 0 ♠  . 0   100 .   0.00  10.24   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   0- 
 0 ♠  . 0   600 .   2.00  10.24   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   0- 
 3 ♦ W 4 . . .   130   1.00   1.00   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   5- 
 0 ♦ . 0   130 .   1.00  10.24   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   0- 
 3 NT  W 3 . . .   600   0.00   2.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   3- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 14








Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
♠ 5 3 2 
♥ K Q T 8 
♦ 8 
♣ A K J T 9 
♠ A 9 
♥ J 9 5 2 
♦ K J 
♣ Q 7 6 3 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ K Q T 7 6 
♥ 4 3 
♦ Q 9 7 6 2 
♣ 8 



♠ J 8 4 
♥ A 7 6 
♦ A T 5 4 3 
♣ 5 4 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 2N; 
NS 3H; NS 3C; EW 1S; 
EW 1D; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 1 NT  W . -3   150 .   2.00   0.00   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   2- 
 0 NT  . 0 .   150   0.00  10.24   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   0- 
 0 NT  . 0 .    50   1.00  10.24   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   0- 
 2 ♥ N . -1 .    50   0.00   2.00   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   5- 
 0 ♥ . 0    50 .   2.00  10.24   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   0- 
 2 ♠  E . -1    50 .   1.00   1.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   3- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 15








Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
♠ K Q J 8 2 
♥ K 9 6 4 3 
♦ 
♣ A 9 2 
♠ A 
♥ T 2 
♦ K Q J T 9 8 5 4 
♣ K 6 


N
W
E
S

♠ T 9 7 4 
♥ Q 7 5 
♦ 7 3 
♣ J 8 5 4 



♠ 6 5 3 
♥ A J 8 
♦ A 6 2 
♣ Q T 7 3 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 1N; 
NS 5S; NS 5H; NS 5C; 
EW 2D; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 5 ♦x W . -2   300 .   0.50   1.50   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   2- 
 0 ♦ . 0 .   300   1.50  10.24   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   0- 
 0 ♦ . 0 .   300   1.50  10.24   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   0- 
 5 ♠  N 5 . .   650 .   2.00   0.00   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   5- 
 0 ♠  . 0 .   650   0.00  10.24   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   0- 
 5 ♦x W . -2   300 .   0.50   1.50   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   3- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 16








Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
♠ A 
♥ J 
♦ K J 9 2 
♣ K Q J T 8 7 2 
♠ 8 6 2 
♥ K Q 2 
♦ Q 4 3 
♣ A 9 5 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q J 9 5 4 
♥ 7 6 5 3 
♦ A 6 
♣ 6 3 



♠ K T 7 3 
♥ A T 9 8 4 
♦ T 8 7 5 
♣ 




DF Analysis: (6) NS 3N; 
NS 2H; N 4D; NS 4C; 
S 1S; S 5D; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 3 ♣ N 5 . .   150 .   0.50   1.50   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   3- 
 0 ♣ . 0 .   150   1.50  10.24   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   0- 
 0 ♣ . 0 .   150   1.50  10.24   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   0- 
 0 ♣ . 0 .   550   0.00  10.24   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   0- 
 3 ♣ N 5 . .   150 .   0.50   1.50   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   2- 
 5 ♣x N 5 . .   550 .   2.00   0.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   4- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 17








Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
♠ Q 7 3 2 
♥ 9 
♦ T 8 6 
♣ K T 7 3 2 
♠ J T 
♥ A K T 5 
♦ A K J 9 7 5 4 
♣ 


N
W
E
S

♠ A 9 8 6 
♥ 6 3 
♦ Q 3 2 
♣ A J 6 5 



♠ K 5 4 
♥ Q J 8 7 4 2 
♦ 
♣ Q 9 8 4 




DF Analysis: (6) NS 1C; 
EW 6N; EW 2S; E 2H; 
EW 6D; W 1H; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 6 ♦ W . -1    50 .   2.00   0.00   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   3- 
 0 ♦ . 0   940 .   2.00  10.24   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   0- 
 0 ♦ . 0 .    50   0.00  10.24   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   0- 
 0 ♦ . 0   130 .   1.00  10.24   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   0- 
 6 ♦ W 7 . . .   940   0.00   2.00   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   2- 
 3 ♦ W 4 . . .   130   1.00   1.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   4- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 18








Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠ K 7 6 2 
♥ K Q 4 
♦ 8 2 
♣ J T 8 7 
♠ A 9 8 
♥ A 9 8 6 5 
♦ A Q 9 
♣ A K 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q J 3 
♥ T 
♦ K J 7 5 3 
♣ 6 5 4 2 



♠ T 5 4 
♥ J 7 3 2 
♦ T 6 4 
♣ Q 9 3 




DF Analysis: (8) EW 4N; 
E 3S; E 3H; EW 6D; 
E 3C; W 4S; W 4H; 
W 4C; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 3 NT  W 6 . . .   490   0.50   1.50   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   3- 
 0 NT  . 0   430 .   0.00  10.24   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   0- 
 0 NT  . 0   490 .   1.50  10.24   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   0- 
 0 NT  . 0   490 .   1.50  10.24   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   0- 
 3 NT  W 4 . . .   430   2.00   0.00   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   2- 
 3 NT  E 6 . . .   490   0.50   1.50   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   4- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 19








Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠ 6 2 
♥ A 8 6 5 
♦ Q 8 7 5 
♣ A Q 7 
♠ A K Q 8 3 
♥ 7 4 3 2 
♦ 9 3 
♣ J 3 


N
W
E
S

♠ J 7 
♥ Q 9 
♦ A K J 6 2 
♣ K T 6 4 



♠ T 9 5 4 
♥ K J T 
♦ T 4 
♣ 9 8 5 2 




DF Analysis: (5) EW 2N; 
EW 3S; EW 1H; EW 2D; 
EW 2C; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 3 NT  E 4 . . .   630   0.00   2.00   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   3- 
 0 NT  . 0   150 .   1.00  10.24   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   0- 
 0 NT  . 0   630 .   2.00  10.24   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   0- 
 0 NT  . 0   110 .   0.00  10.24   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   0- 
 1 NT  E 3 . . .   150   1.00   1.00   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   2- 
 2 ♠  W 2 . . .   110   2.00   0.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   4- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 20








Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
♠ 8 5 
♥ A T 
♦ K T 7 5 4 3 
♣ Q J 5 
♠ 7 4 2 
♥ K 8 5 4 2 
♦ Q 6 2 
♣ 7 6 


N
W
E
S

♠ K Q T 9 3 
♥ 7 6 
♦ J 8 
♣ A K 9 8 



♠ A J 6 
♥ Q J 9 3 
♦ A 9 
♣ T 4 3 2 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 3N; 
NS 1S; NS 1H; NS 3D; 
NS 3C; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 3 ♠  E . -3   300 .   2.00   0.00   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   3- 
 0 ♠  . 0 .   100   2.00  10.24   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   0- 
 0 ♠  . 0 .   300   0.00  10.24   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   0- 
 0 ♠  . 0 .   130   1.00  10.24   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   0- 
 3 ♠  E . -1   100 .   0.00   2.00   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   2- 
 3 ♦ N 4 . .   130 .   1.00   1.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   4- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 21








Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠ A K T 9 
♥ 8 5 
♦ Q T 9 6 3 
♣ A 4 
♠ 7 
♥ A 4 2 
♦ A K 8 5 4 
♣ K 7 6 2 


N
W
E
S

♠ Q 6 5 4 3 2 
♥ K T 9 
♦ 7 
♣ Q 5 3 



♠ J 8 
♥ Q J 7 6 3 
♦ J 2 
♣ J T 9 8 




DF Analysis: (5) EW 1N; 
EW 2S; EW 1H; EW 1D; 
EW 2C; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 0 m�A . 0 .    50   1.00  10.24   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 4 ♠  E . -3   150 .   2.00   0.00   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   3- 
 0 ♠  . 0 .   150   0.00  10.24   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   0- 
 2 NT  W . -1    50 .   1.00   1.00   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   1- 
 0 NT  . 0   300 .   2.00  10.24   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   0- 
 3 NT  N . -3 .   300   0.00   2.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   5- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 22








Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠ Q 9 3 
♥ K T 9 8 5 
♦ Q T 
♣ A 8 2 
♠ K J 7 5 4 2 
♥ 3 2 
♦ 9 5 2 
♣ T 6 


N
W
E
S

♠ A T 6 
♥ Q J 6 4 
♦ A K 
♣ K 5 4 3 



♠ 8 
♥ A 7 
♦ J 8 7 6 4 3 
♣ Q J 9 7 




DF Analysis: (5) N 1H; 
NS 2D; NS 1C; EW 1N; 
EW 4S; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 0 m�A . 0   140 .   2.00  10.24   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 4 ♠  W . -2   200 .   2.00   0.00   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   3- 
 0 ♠  . 0 .   200   0.00  10.24   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   0- 
 3 ♠  E 3 . . .   140   0.00   2.00   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   1- 
 0 ♠  . 0 .   100   1.00  10.24   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   0- 
 4 ♠  E . -1   100 .   1.00   1.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   5- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 23








Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
♠ T 4 3 
♥ 8 7 
♦ K Q T 8 7 2 
♣ J 3 
♠ J 9 8 
♥ Q 9 6 3 
♦ J 6 
♣ A K 8 5 


N
W
E
S

♠ A 5 
♥ A T 5 4 
♦ 5 3 
♣ Q 9 7 6 2 



♠ K Q 7 6 2 
♥ K J 2 
♦ A 9 4 
♣ T 4 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 3S; 
NS 3D; EW 1N; EW 3H; 
EW 3C; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 0 m�A . 0 .   170   0.50  10.24   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 2 ♠  N 4 . .   170 .   1.50   0.50   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   3- 
 0 ♠  . 0 .   170   0.50  10.24   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   0- 
 2 ♠  S 4 . .   170 .   1.50   0.50   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   1- 
 0 ♠  . 0   200 .   2.00  10.24   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   0- 
 4 ♠  S . -2 .   200   0.00   2.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   5- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 24








Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
♠ J 8 2 
♥ J 9 6 3 2 
♦ 2 
♣ J T 7 3 
♠ K T 6 3 
♥ 8 
♦ A J 9 
♣ A K 9 8 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ A Q 4 
♥ Q T 7 
♦ K Q 7 
♣ Q 6 5 2 



♠ 9 7 5 
♥ A K 5 4 
♦ T 8 6 5 4 3 
♣ 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 1H; 
EW 4N; EW 5S; EW 2D; 
EW 5C; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 0 m�A . 0   430 .   1.00  10.24   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 3 NT  E 5 . . .   460   0.00   2.00   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   3- 
 0 NT  . 0   460 .   2.00  10.24   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   0- 
 3 NT  E 4 . . .   430   1.00   1.00   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   1- 
 0 NT  . 0 .    50   0.00  10.24   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   0- 
 6 ♣ W . -1    50 .   2.00   0.00   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   5- 




 RESULTS OF BOARD 25








Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠ J 4 3 2 
♥ Q J 
♦ A J 
♣ A K 7 5 3 
♠ A 
♥ A K 9 8 7 6 5 4 
♦ 9 2 
♣ 6 4 


N
W
E
S

♠ 7 5 
♥ T 3 
♦ T 8 6 5 
♣ Q J T 9 2 



♠ K Q T 9 8 6 
♥ 2 
♦ K Q 7 4 3 
♣ 8 




DF Analysis: (5) NS 5S; 
NS 4D; NS 2C; EW 2N; 
EW 2H; 


SCORES       MATCHPOINTS

BID made down N-S   E-W     N-S     E-W    Names
 0 m�A . 0 .   450   1.50  10.24   1-Ryder - Ryder  vs   0- 
 5 ♠  N 6 . .   480 .   2.00   0.00   2-Marsh - Spanier  vs   3- 
 0 ♠  . 0 .   480   0.00  10.24   3-Dombrowski - Milligan  vs   0- 
 4 ♠  N 5 . .   450 .   0.50   1.50   4-Gilmore - Toher  vs   1- 
 0 ♠  . 0 .   450   1.50  10.24   5-Caccamise - Rosencrantz  vs   0- 
 4 ♠  N 5 . .   450 .   0.50   1.50   6-Nitzberg - Bellus  vs   5-
at end of travelers after travelers =======================
NS Section Sect F Winners 6 PAIRS
Pr	MPs	A	B		Names	Score	Percent
F-2	1.49	1	.	.	(A)Bud Marsh, Scottsdale,AZ; Marianne Spanier, Scottsdale,AZ	33.50	67.00
F-5	1.97	2	1	.	(B)Diane Caccamise, Coos Bay,OR; Bill Rosencrantz, North Bend,OR	27.00	54.00
F-1	1.30	3	2/3	.	(B)Suzy Ryder, Boise,ID; Thomas Ryder, Boise,ID	24.50	49.00
F-3	1.30	4	2/3	1	(C)Chip Dombrowski, North Bend,OR; Ian Milligan, Corvallis,OR	24.50	49.00
F-4	.	5	.	.	(C)Marjorie Gilmore, Richland,WA; Marilyn Toher, Kennewick,WA	21.00	42.00
F-6	.	6	.	.	(B)Gary Nitzberg, Carson City,NV; Verna Bellus, Bend,OR	19.50	39.00
THURSDAY MORN SIDE PAIRS

May 15, 2014

NS Section Sect F Winners6 PAIRS

Results for Section F No Boards played 25 Average Score 25.00

NS Section Sect F Winners
6 PAIRS
